Out For Tender

Out For Tender › Stany Zjednoczone › Maszyny biurowe i liczące, sprzęt i materiały, z wyjątkiem mebli i pakietów oprogramowania

SEAL Pro D w/ Productively Pack

This tender has closed. It stays online as a record of what was advertised.

Zamawiający
FA9301 AFTC PZIO, Dept of Defense
Kraj
Stany Zjednoczone
Kategoria
Maszyny biurowe i liczące, sprzęt i materiały, z wyjątkiem mebli i pakietów oprogramowania
Termin składania ofert
Zamknięty (25 Sep 2026 14:00 UTC-7)
Opublikowano
24 Sep 2026
Procedura
Combined Synopsis/Solicitation - Small Business Set Aside - Total

Przeczytaj oficjalne ogłoszenie i złóż ofertę → Oferty składa się zawsze na portalu zamawiającego, nigdy tutaj.

Czego szuka zamawiający

Request for Quote (RFQ): SEAL 62 PRO D WITH PRODUCTIVITY PACK This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial products or commercial services prepared in accordance with part 12. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Offers are being requested and a separate written solicitation will not be issued. Solicitation number FA930126Q0037 is issued as a request for quotation (RFQ) for SEAL Pro D W/ Productivity Pack. 100% Small Busieness Set Aside This acquisition is set aside for small business concerns. This solicitation incorporates provisions and clauses by reference. The full text of provisions and clauses may be accessed electronically at www.acquisition.gov. Background: The primary purpose is to apply a protective film to oversized printed media (typically up to 50" width by 1'-15' length) to shield it from damage and improve appearance and durability. Used primarily for chain of command boards, leadership head shots, organization shields, large mounted display boards, banners, posters, photos. See attached Salient Charateristics sheet attached for further information. Product service code (PSC) 7490and North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 423420 are being considered for this requirement. Basis for Award: Comparative Evaluation The Government intends to award a contract to the responsible offeror whose quotation, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to represent the best value to the Government. Evaluation Methodology In accordance with RFO 12.203, the Government will utilize a Comparative Evaluation process. Rather than rating or scoring each quotation individually against a rigid, predetermined evaluation rubric, the Government will compare all received quotations directly against one another to identify which submission offers the most advantageous solution. Evaluation Factors for Comparison The Government will compare quotations based on the following factors to determine which provides the best overall value: Evaluation Factors: *Technical Capability - the Government will compare the proposed features, methods, and technical solutions of each quotation directly against the others. The goal is to determine which proposed approach provides the greatest benefit, utility, and likelihood of successfully meeting or exceeding the requirements outlined in the Salient Charateristics. *Past Performance - the Government will compare the recent and relevant past performance records of the competing offerors. The Government may utilize the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other independent government or commercial sources to determine which offeror presents the lowest performance risk and the highest probability of success. *Price -the Government will compare the proposed prices to ensure they are fair and reasonable. Price will be evaluated in conjunction with the non-price factors to determine if the relative benefits of a specific quotation justify its proposed cost. *Delivery and warranty Selection Decision: The agency will first rank quotations according to price, from lowest to highest, and will evaluate the three (3) lowest-priced quotations as either technically acceptable or unacceptable, reserving the right to evaluate additional quotations for technical acceptability if deemed to be in the best interest of the government. Because this is a comparative evaluation, the Government is not required to establish a predefined rating scale. The Government reserves the right to select a quotation that is not the lowest priced if the direct comparison reveals that the technical superiority or stronger past performance of a higher-priced quotation provides a better overall value to the Government. The final decision will be based on a documented rationale explaining why the successful quotation is the best value for the Government. The tasks to be carried out include: DESCRIPTION SITE Unit Type UNIT PRICE CLIN 0001 SEAL 62 Pro D With Productivitly Pack.…

Język tego ogłoszenia: English. Tytuł i opis pokazujemy dokładnie tak, jak opublikował je zamawiający.

Source: SAM · reference FA930126Q0037 · JSON